Capacity-Building in School Programs (EE)This is a featured page

This initial or rough draft of a summary (formatted in an encyclopedia entry format) has been started by the International School Health Network from a previous Canadian project. Visitors to and members of this wiki-based web site are welcome to edit the draft (using the Easy Edit" tool found at the top of the page or to comment on the draft by using the "thread" tool found at the bottom of the page. (All previous versions of this page are automatically saved by the system, so don't hesitate to edit this page). Eventually, when time and resources permit, this initial draft will be formatted in accordance with the outline for glossary terms, encyclopedia entries, and handbook sections used in this knowledge exchange program for health,safety, educational and social development interventions.

The Canadian School Health Research Network has adapted and elaborated on a capacity assessment tool developed originally by the World Health Organization. Eight key system capacities have been identified in this model. As well, capacity considerations would need to be applied at different levels, including national and state level agencies , federal and provincial/state departments, communities, local agencies such as school boards and health authorities and schools as well as among different professions, including nurses, police, guidance counsellors, social workers, addictions workers,, teachers and others.

The following points about capacity building are taken from a statement published by the International School Health Network.

9. Build capacities at all levelsThis is a featured page
This sub-section begins a necessary discussion of the capacities required of professionals, schools, communities, agencies/school boards and governments in order to sustain programs. Far too often, we seek to emulate well-designed, coordinated programs while not having the resources necessary to deliver them over the long-term. Once again, we need more research, monitoring and public/professional attnetion to this fundamental apect of school program planning anddleivery.

This sub-section presents several several concepts and related good/promising practices on capacity building. The eight different types pf capacities are drawn from a national assessment tool originally developed by the World Health Organization, adapted by researchers in Canada and now widely accepted by governments and non-governmental organizations.

During this initial phase of our consultation on this wiki, we ask visitors to this page to comment (Use the "Thread" tool at the bottom of the page) and/or to suggest research, resources, experts, examples and other information related to this point (Use the Easy Edit at the top of the page to add suggestions directly on the page).

This section contains these sub-points. Go to the pages on these sub-points to see the related concepts and practices.

9. Build Capacity

9.1 Build different types of capacities including: - Coordinated policy/leadership - Assigned Staff for coordination - Mechanisms for cooperation - Knowledge synthesis & exchange - Workforce development - Monitoring & Reporting - Joint priority, trend analysis - Explicit sustainability planning

9.2 Build capacity at all levels (government, agency, school, professional, community) capacities


9.1 Build different types of capacitiesThis is a featured page Build different types of capacities including:

- Coordinated policy/leadership
- Staff for coordination
- Mechanisms for cooperation
- Knowledge synthesis & exchange
- Workforce development
- Monitoring & Reporting
- Joint priority, trend analysis
- Explicit sustainability planning

Theories developed by educational researchers have examined this issue of system capacity and defined over-arching strategies such as continuous improvement, or transformational strategies to guide the planning for programs and comprehensive, coordinated approaches.

Researchers have also developed into various applied and theoretical models of capacity-building in health promotion. These concepts of continuous improvement and capacity building have been used to plan and evaluated school health programs. The Ottawa Charter was the among the first key documents suggesting that we should re-orient health care, social, justice and employment services & systems towards prevention and promotion.

Similarly, reform movements in education as well as school improvement research can include efforts to place more emphasis on social and custodial roles and to include health more within academic and vocational preparation roles. Capacity can be built at various levels and in various ways. These include at a government/system level, agency/school board level, school/neighbourhood level, among and within professions as well as at a community and family level.

These capacities at each of these levels can be built in a variety of ways such as those defined by the World Health Organization:
  • coordinated policy & leadership,
  • assigned staffing & infrastructure to coordinate,
  • formal & informal mechanisms for cooperation,
  • ongoing and supported knowledge transfer/exchange,
  • ongoing and supported workforce/skills development,
  • regular monitoring/ reporting, program evaluation and periodic needs/resources/planning assessments
  • strategic issue management, defined system priorities
  • explicit sustainability planning.

(Note: See the right hand column for an elaboration of these ways to build capacity at three levels within publicly funded systems.

Community capacities such as cohesiveness, norms, expectations, physical and social resources and other factors can be a factor in school program success or failure.

Professional capacities specifically related to the roles assigned in the school programs need to be taken into account.

Not only different types of teachers, (health, PE, family studies) but also guidance counselors, principals, student services personnel, school psychologists, public health/school nurses, police officers, school social workers, public health inspectors, addictions workers, nutritionists/dietitians, mental health workers, early childhood educators and sports/recreation specialists ands coaches need to be trained to work within and with schools,

This will include pre-service training, required qualifications and experience, ongoing in-service training, special certification and post-graduate studies and expertise. Inter-professional skills and qualifications should also be part of work force development planning.

The sustainability of school programs needs further study and elaboration into applied policy, program and practice considerations. Institutionalization of the change within the routines of the organization or system is critical.

9.2 Build capacity at all levels (government, agency, school, professional, community) capacities

Theories developed by educational researchers have examined this issue of system capacity and defined over-arching strategies such as continuous improvement, or transformational strategies to guide the planning for programs and comprehensive, coordinated approaches.

Researchers have also developed into various applied and theoretical models of capacity-building in health promotion. These concepts of continuous improvement and capacity building have been used to plan and evaluated school health programs. The Ottawa Charter was the among the first key documents suggesting that we should re-orient health care, social, justice and employment services & systems towards prevention and promotion.

Similarly, reform movements in education as well as school improvement research can include efforts to place more emphasis on social and custodial roles and to include health more within academic and vocational preparation roles.

Capacity can be built at various levels and in various ways. These include at a government/system level,
agency/school board level, school/neighbourhood level, among and within professions as well as at a community and family level.


Promising, good or better practices at
:


All Levels:

Government Ministries

Local Agencies

Schools/Neighbourhoods
Several national organizations in Canada have published a Consensus Statement on Comprehensive School Health that includes a description of system and agency capacity adapted an assessment tool used by the World Health Organization. A similar list of capacities has been adopted by the intergovernmental Joint Consortium for School Health that represents Canadian provinces/territories and the Public Health Agency of Canada. That consensus statement includes this overview:

"In order to support health-promoting school communities in a sustained manner, the organizational capacities of health and education systems (ministries, agencies, schools, professionals, communities) need to be strengthened in areas such as (1, 2):
  • comprehensive and coordinated policies on school health, health issues and the elements of school health promotion that are actively supported by senior managers;
  • assigned staffing infrastructure to support interdisciplinary cooperation at all levels;
  • formal and informal mechanisms for coordination and cooperation;
  • active knowledge transfer and exchange within and across sectors;
  • ongoing workforce development of health and education professionals through professional preparation programs and staff development;
  • providing regular and reliable data on the health status, determinants, behaviours, attitudes, skills and knowledge of children and youth, as well as periodic surveys and self-assessments of policy/program capacity;
  • regular scans of the environments, trends and emerging issues that affect the health of children and youth;
  • an explicit plan for appropriate and sustained funding to ensure the continuance of programs which demonstrate effectiveness".

a) Coordinated policy & leadership

b) Assigned staff & infrastructure to coordinateThis is a featured page

c) Formal and informal cooperationThis is a featured page

d) Knowledge synthesis & exchangeThis is a featured page

e) Workforce developmentThis is a featured page

f) Monitoring & reporting

g) Joint identification of priorities & emerging trendsThis is a featured page

h) Explicit plan for sustainabilityThis is a featured page




dmccall
dmccall
Latest page update: made by dmccall , May 26 2010, 11:14 AM EDT (about this update About This Update dmccall Moved from: Key/Core Topics Used in this Web Site/KE Program - dmccall

No content added or deleted.

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)
More Info: links to this page

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.